tedr is a clicking machine.
-
Web Marketing SEO Tools Score
Quality free SEO reporting tool. It doesn't tell you that much actually, but certainly worth the free review.
« details- Story posted by:
- tedr on Thu, May 15 '08 - 10:57 PM
- permalink
-
« details
- Micro-blog posted by:
- tedr on Thu, May 15 '08 - 09:18 PM
- permalink
-
« details
- Image posted by:
- tedr on Thu, May 15 '08 - 08:53 PM
- permalink
-
« details
- Micro-blog posted by:
- tedr on Thu, May 15 '08 - 06:23 PM
- permalink
-
« details
- Micro-blog posted by:
- tedr on Thu, May 15 '08 - 02:56 PM
- permalink
-
Hey SF vloggers, anyone know a sf store that sells replacement xacti batteries. pls D me if so. thx!
« details- Micro-blog posted by:
- tedr on Thu, May 15 '08 - 01:15 PM
- permalink
-
Make small, sharable photo sets with TinyAlbum
Too cheap for a Flickr pro membership and scared of Zooomr? Check out TinyAlbum, a super simple and minimalist photo-hosting service that will let you upload as many photos as you want (at up to 8MB a file) into slick little albums.
The UI shares a lot in common with Flickr, and incorporates a handful of really user-friendly features like drag-and-drop reordering, on the fly rotation, and links to various sizes for download. It's missing an open API, something that makes Flickr so incredibly useful in conjunction with third-party services, but the speed and ease of use are top notch for a small, independent app.
I managed to put together three albums with full-resolution shots in just a few minutes. The service is missing something similar to Flickr's explore page, but you can discover new content uploaded by other users in both a stream on the front page, as well as a Digg-spy-like service that shows you the most recently active users as well as what tags they've affixed to their shots.
See also: Photie serves up unlimited storage for your photos
Flickr users will find TinyAlbums familiar; however the service's speed is far peppier than the photo-hosting giant (click to enlarge).
(Credit: CNET Networks)« details- Story posted by:
- tedr on Wed, May 14 '08 - 04:54 PM
- permalink
-
« details
- Micro-blog posted by:
- tedr on Wed, May 14 '08 - 01:04 PM
- permalink
-
« details
- Micro-blog posted by:
- tedr on Tue, May 13 '08 - 11:21 PM
- permalink
-
Rapleaf study of friends -- full data
This is an interesting study we did last month about where people's friend data comes from and how it relates to gender.
Friends of Men vs. Women on Social Networks
Men tend to be more transactional and less relationship building when it comes to their friends on social networks. Women tend to have slightly more friends on average.
In the largest social networking study ever done, Rapleaf sampled over 30 million people looking at social graph information across various social networks including Bebo, Facebook, Friendster, Hi5, LiveJournal, Myspace, Flickr, and others. We looked at the number of friends that women have vs. men across these social networks. The following are highlights of the information we extracted:
- Rapleaf sampled 30.74 million people with at least 1 friend- Of the people with at least 1 friend, 53.57% are female and 46.43% are male
- Social Networkers (1-100 friends):
- ~80% of the sample set
- Women have on average 62 friends
- Men have on average 57 friends
- Women are more likely to be Social Networkers
- Connectors (100-1000 friends):
- ~19% of the sample set
- Women have on average 185 friends
- Men have on average 172 friends
- Women are more likely to be Connectors
- Super Connectors (1000-10000 friends):
- 0.66% of the sample set
- Women have on average 1,837 friends
- Men have on average 1,944 friends
- Men are more like to be Super Connectors
- Uber Connectors (10000+ friends)
- 0.02% of the sample set
- Women have on average 24,077 friends
- Men have on average 24,584 friends
- Men are more likely to be Uber Connectors
Our analysis:
As per Rapleaf's original study [link], women spend more time on social networks. While the full data below demonstrates that women do have slightly more friends than men on social networks, the difference isn't substantial.While we theorize that women spend more time on social networks, building and nurturing relationships, we also theorize that men are less likely to spend as much time nurturing relationships as they are acquiring relationships from a transactional standpoint. Spending less time on a social network but transacting more equates to having roughly the same number of friends as women, who spend more time on social networks, but are busier sustaining relationships.
Full in-depth report:
Women Men Count % Avg. Count % Avg. 1 friend 3,477,849 21.12% 3,139,918 22.00% 2-5 friends 3,127,321 18.99% 2,904,458 20.35% 6-10 friends 1,506,900 9.15% 1,306,375 9.15% 11-20 friends 1,452,552 8.82% 1,266,455 8.87% 21-30 friends 809,235 4.91% 703,960 4.93% 31-40 friends 583,339 3.54% 499,574 3.50% 41-50 friends 469,606 2.85% 396,328 2.78% 50-100 friends 1,593,346 9.68% 1,303,557 9.13% 100-1,000 friends 3,336,626 20.26% 2,655,297 18.60% 1-100 friends (Social Networkers) 13,020,148 79.07% 62 11,520,625 80.72% 57 101-1,000 friends (Connectors) 3,336,626 20.26% 185 2,655,297 18.60% 172 1,001-10,000 friends (Super Connectors) 107,062 0.65% 1,837 93,676 0.66% 1,944 10,000+ friends (Uber Connectors) 1,989 0.01% 24,077 2,371 0.02% 24,584 At least 1 friend 16,465,825 100.00% 81 14,271,969 100.00% 78
some of the places that wrote about this report include:« details- Story posted by:
- tedr on Tue, May 13 '08 - 09:32 PM
- permalink
